Refine your search
Collections
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Onkara Naik, S.
- Impact of Integrated Pest Management Modules on Natural Enemies of Whiteflies, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) in Bitter Gourd Ecosystem
Abstract Views :270 |
PDF Views:155
Authors
Affiliations
1 Division of Entomology and Nematology, ICAR- Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru, IN
2 School of Agriculture and Animal Science, Gandhigram Rural Institute- Deemed University, Gandhigram, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, IN
1 Division of Entomology and Nematology, ICAR- Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru, IN
2 School of Agriculture and Animal Science, Gandhigram Rural Institute- Deemed University, Gandhigram, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 33, No 1 (2019), Pagination: 63-69Abstract
The impact of eight IPM modules on whitefly Bemisia tabaci and its natural enemies were recorded during kharif 2016 and 2017, rabi-summer 2016-17 and 2017-18. There was a significant difference among the modules in the number of natural enemies per plant. In general, it was found that during rabi-summer the population of B. tabaci was higher than the kharif season on bitter gourd. When modules were compared for the population of B. tabaci, module 1 to 4 (sowing maize as a barrier crop, removal of infested leaves and residues from the appearance of pests, erection of solar light trap with yellow pan @ 5 traps/ha for trapping, tying yellow sticky trap to attract whiteflies, spraying neem oil @ 1% and pongam oil @1%) and module 6 (spraying of Metarhizium anisopliae (2 x 109), Beauveria bassiana (2 x 108), Neem oil 1% and Pongam oil 1%) which do not include frequent insecticidal applications recorded higher number of coccinellids, syrphids, hymenopterans and spiders than the IPM modules where frequent applications of chemical insecticides were included as a treatment.Keywords
IPM Modules, Natural Enemies, Whiteflies.Full Text
References
- Asiimwe P, Ecaat JS, Guershon M, Kyamanywa S, Gerling D, Legg JP. 2007. Evaluation of Serangium sp. (Col., Coccinellidae), a predator of Bemisia tabaci (Hom., Aleyrodidae) on cassava. J Appl Entomol. 131: 76−80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2006.01122.x.
- Atuncha A, Amata EAR, Mwirichia R, Kasina M, Mbevi B, Wakoli E. 2013. Evaluation of predation potential of coccinellids on cassava whiteflies. J Entomol Nematol. 5: 84−87. https://doi.org/10.5897/JEN2012.022.
- Chu CC, Pinter PJJ, Henneberry TJ, Umeda K, Nawick ET, Wei YA, Reddy VR, Shrepatis M. 2000. Use of CC Traps with different trap base colors for silverleaf whiteflies (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), and leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) J Econ Entomol. 93: 1329. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-93.4.1329.
- Gerling D, Alomar O, Arno J. 2001. Biological control of Bemisia tabaci using predators and parasitoids. Crop Prot. 20: 779−799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S02612194(01)00111-9.
- Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edn., John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA; p. 680. ISBN: 13-9780471879312.
- Gurlaz Kaur, Sangha KS. 2016. Diversity of arthropod fauna associated with chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) in Punjab. J Entomol Zool Studies 4(5): 390−396.
- Kapadia MN, Puri SN. 1991. Biology and comparative predation efficacy of three heteropteran species recorded as predators of Bemisia tabaci in Maharashtra. Entomophaga 36: 555−559. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374438.
- Kedar SC, Saini RK, Kumaranag KM, Sharma SS. 2014. Record of natural enemies of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in some cultivated crops in Haryana. J Biopestic. 7(1): 57−59.
- Li SJ, Xue X, Ahmed MZ, Ren SX, Du YZ, Wu JH, Cuthbertson AGS, Qiu BL. 2011. Host plants and natural enemies of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in China. J Insect Sci. 18: 101−120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2010.01395.x.
- Mutwiwa UN, Tantau HJ. 2005. Agricultural Engineering International. CIGRE Journal. VII.
- Natarajan K. 1990. Natural enemies of Bemisia tabaci Genn. and effect of insecticides on their activity. J Biol Control 4: 86−88.
- Nisha Lekshmi. 2013. Evaluation of different Integrated Pest Management components against fruit fly (Bactrocera Cucurbitae Coquillet) and whiteflies (Bemisia Tabaci Genn.) in bitter gourd (Momordica Charantia L.). PhD Thesis submitted to IARI, New Delhi. http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810009838.
- Nordlund DA, Legaspi JC. 1996. Whitefly predators and their potential for use in biological control. Pp. 499−513. In: Gerling D and Mayer RT (Eds.). Bemisia 1995: Taxonomy, Biology, Damage, Control and Management. Intercept Ltd, Andover, Hants, U.K..
- Oliveira MRV, Henneberry TJ, Anderson PK. 2001. History, current status and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci. Crop Prot. 20: 709−723.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00108-9.
- Palaniswami MS, Antony B, Vijayan SL, Henneberry TJ. 2001. Sweet potato whitefly Bemisia tabaci: Ecobiology, host interaction and natural enemies. Entomon 26: 256−262.
- Rao NV, Reddy AS, Rao KT. 1989. Natural enemies of cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Genn. in relation to host population and weather factors. J Biol Control 3: 10−12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400021822.
- Sardana HR, Bambawale OM, Singh DK and Kadu LN. 2006. Conservation of natural enemies through IPM in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) fields. Entomon 31(2): 83−88.
- Torres LC, Lourencao AL, Costa VA, Souza B, Costa MB, Tanque RL. 2014. Records of natural enemies of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Biotype B in Brazil. Neotrop Entomol. 43: 189−191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-013-0188-3.
- Efficacy of Integrated Pest Management Tools Evaluated against Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) on Tomato in India
Abstract Views :321 |
PDF Views:178
Authors
Affiliations
1 Division of Entomology and Nematology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru – 560089, Karnataka, IN
1 Division of Entomology and Nematology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru – 560089, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 33, No 3 (2019), Pagination: 264-270Abstract
South American tomato moth, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is an invasive pest on tomato and other solanaceous crops. In general, 20 to 30 % yield loss is caused by this pest and sometimes it may result in 100% damage, if timely management interventions are not followed. Though the pest was reported in India during 2014, presently it has spread to several tomato growing states. In the present study various IPM tools have been evaluated against this pest. As a long-term strategy of resistance breeding, genotype screening was carried out for identification of resistance sources from wild and cultivated tomato genotypes showing resistance/tolerance against T. absoluta. Among the evaluated wild and cultivated tomato genotypes, Solanum pennellii (Accession, LA 1940) was identified as a resistant source against T. absoluta both under choice and no-choice bioassays and is being used for resistance breeding. Various entomopathogens (Bacillus thuringiensis, Metarhizium anisopliae, Beauveria bassiana and M. rileyi), egg parasitoids (Trichogramma chilonis, T. pretiosum and Trichogrammatoidea bactrae), light traps, pheromone traps, synthetic insecticides, botanical origin insecticides were also evaluated for their relative efficacy. Among the egg parasitoids T. pretiosum and among synthetic chemicals, spinetoram 12 SC@ 1.25ml/l were found very effective for the management of T. absoluta. Yellow light traps were found as an effective component for integrated management of T. absoluta. Azadirachtin 5% EC at the tested concentrations showed highest mean radial growth (24.67 mm) with relatively less inhibition (16.51%) of M. anisopliae indicating these combinations can be effectively utilised in the eco-friendly management of T. absoluta. We reported natural incidence of M. anisopliae on T. absoluta larvae, causing up to 35 per cent mortality during 2016-17.
Keywords
Entomopathogens, Host Plant Resistance, IPM, Light Traps, Pheromone Traps, Tuta absoluta.Full Text
References
- Abdelgaleil SAM, El-bakary AS, Shawir MS, Ramadan GRM. 2015. Efficacy of various insceticides against Tomato leaf moth (Tuta absoluta) in Egypt. Appl Biol Res. 17: 297-301 https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-4517.2015.00042.7
- Ali KB, Alime B, Yakup C, Ysmail K. 2014. Growth inhibitory effects of bio and synthetic insecticides on Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Turkish J Entomol. 38: 389-400. https://doi.org/10.16970/ted.96884
- Antonio BF, Jose EMA, Clovis L. 2001. Effect of thiamethoxam on entomopathogenic microorganisms. Neotrop Entomol. 30: 437-447. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2001000300017
- Bitew MK. 2018. Significant role of wild genotypes of tomato trichomes for Tuta absoluta resistance. J Pl Genet Br. 2: 104.
- Bratu E, Petcuci AM, Sovarel G. 2015. Efficacy of the product spinosad, an insecticide used in control of Tomato leaf miner (Tuta absoluta Meyrick, 1917). Bull UASVM Hort. 72: 209-210
- Faira, CA, Torres JB, Fernandes AMV, Faira AMI 2007. Parasitism of Tuta absoluta in tomato plants by Trichogramma pretiosum Riley in response to host density and plant structures. Ciência Rural 38: 1504-1509. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782008000600002
- Eleonora AD, Vili BH. 2014. Efficacy evaluation of insecticides on larvae of the Tomato Borer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera:Gelechiidae) under laboratory condition. J Int Scientific Pub Agric Food 2: 158-164.
- Goda NF, El-Heneidy AH, Djelouah K, Hassan N. 2015. Integrated pest management of the tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in tomato fields in Egypt. Egyptian J Biol Pest Control 25: 655.
- Hokkanen HMT, Kotiluoto R.1992. Bioassay of the side effects of pesticides on Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae: standardized sequential testing procedure. IOBC/WPRS Bull. 11: 148-151.
- Lietti MMM, Botto E, Alzogaray AR. 2005. Insecticide resistance in Argentine populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Neotrop Entomol. 34: 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2005000100016
- Luckwill LC. 1943. The genus lycopersicon: An historical, biological and taxonomic survey of the wild and cultivated tomatoes. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 44 pp.
- Maluf, WR, Maciel GM, Gomes LAA, Cardoso MDG, Gonçalves LD, da Silva EC, Knapp M. 2010.Broad spectrum arthropod resistance in hybrids between high and low- and low-acyl sugar tomato lines. Crop Sci. 50: 439-450. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.01.0045
- Mollá O, González CJ, Urbaneja A, 2011. The combined use of Bacillus thuringiensis and Nesidiocoris tenuis against the tomato borer Tuta absoluta. BioControl. 56: 883-891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-011-9353-y
- Moorhouse ER., Gillsepie AT, Sellers EK, Charnley AK. 1992. Influence of fungicides and insecticides on the entomogenous fungus, Metarhizium anisopliae, a pathogen of the vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2: 404–407.
- Nitin KS, Sridhar V, Kumar KP, Chakravarthy AK. 2017. Seasonal Incidence of South American Tomato Moth, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Gelechiidae: Lepidoptera) on Tomato Ecosystem. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 5: 521-525. https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2576
- Patricia L, Cristian E, Jorge M, Jeovanny R. 2014. Insecticide effect of cyantraniliprole on tomato moth, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) larvae in field trials. Chilean J Agric Res. 74: 178-183. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392014000200008
- Pires LM, Marques EJ, de Oliveira JV, Alves SB. 2010. Selection of isolates of entomopathogenic fungi for controlling Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and their compatibility with insecticides used in tomato crop. Neotrop Entomol. 39: 977-984. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2010000600020 PMid:21271067
- Pires LM, Marques EJ, Wanderley-Teixeira V, Teixeira ÂAC, Alves LC, Alves ESB, 2009. Ultrastructure of Tuta absoluta parasitized eggs and the reproductive potential of females after parasitism by Metarhizium anisopliae. Micron 40: 255-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2008.07.008 PMid:18789707
- Roditakis E, Skarmoutsou C, Staurakaki, M, del Rosario Martinez, Aguirre M, Garua-vidal L, Bielza P, Haddi K, Rapisarda C, Rison JL, Bassi A, Teixeira LA. 2013. etermination of baseline susceptibility of European population of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) to indoxacarb and chlorantraniliprole using a novel dip bioassay method. Pest Manage Sci. 69: 217-227.
- Siqueira, HÁA, Guedes RNC, Picanço MC. 2000. Insecticide resistance in populations of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Agric Forest Entomol. 2: 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-9563.2000.00062.x
- Sridhar V, Chakravarthy AK, Asokan R, Vinesh LS, Rebijith KB, Vennila S. 2014. New record of the invasive South American tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in India. Pest Manage Hort Ecosys. 20: 148-154.
- Sridhar VS, Onkara Naik K, Nitin S. 2016. Efficacy of new molecules of insecticides against South American tomato moth, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Pest Manage Hort Ecosys. 22: 137-145.
- Taram SK, Ganguli JL, Ganguli RN, Singh J. 2016. South American tomato borer, Tuta absoluta (Povolny): A new threat on tomato in Raipur, Chhattisgarh. J Appl Zool Res. 27: 53-56.